Natural selection is the survival and procreation of the strongest. And Mutations are random changes in the preexisting genes of living beings.
According to evolutionist's these two mechanisms are complementary, they maintain that by random mutations a useful trait appears and this trait is then selected by natural selection. These useful traits accumulate over time causing one species to turn into a whole new species. in other words, evolutionists believe that beneficial mutations and their selection by nature lead to speciation. However, when we look further into these mechanisms, we find that no such complimentary mechanism exists in nature. Scientific observations and experiments have only shown the contrary.
Natural selection as an evolutionary mechanism was first theorized by Charles Darwin, it is based on the assumption that in nature there is a constant struggle for survival and that the strongest ones, the ones most suited to their environmental conditions, survive and reproduce. Although this mechanism is observable in nature, it does nothing to turn one species into another. For example, in a herd of deer under threat from predators, surely the fastest running will survive and the slow or weak will be eliminated. And the herd of deer will eventually consist of only fast-running deer. No matter how many times the herd of deer goes through the process of natural selection, it will still remain deer. And there is no way these deer will turn into horses or any other resembling species. The same is true for all other species. Deformed or weak individuals in a population or those unfitted to environmental conditions are eliminated by way of natural selection. But no new species emerge. Since no new species emerge, no evolution takes place.
This mechanism proposed for evolution has also been refuted by evolutionists themselves,
a prominent evolutionist Colin Patterson, stresses that natural selection has never been observed to have the ability to cause living things to evolve:
''No one has ever produced a [new] species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.'' (Colin Patterson, “Cladistics,” BBC, Interview with Brian, Peter Franz, 4 March 1982.)
MUTATION: Realizing that natural selection alone cannot account for evolution, Darwinists of the 20th century included Mutation as a leading mechanism of evolution.
Mutations are random changes or errors taking place in the DNA of an organism from external effects such as radiation and chemical exposure or from coping mistakes during cell division. Nearly all mutations are detrimental to living beings. But Darwinists claim that these detrimental errors cause living beings to evolve in a better way.
Scientific observations and experiments have proven that almost all mutations are lethal to living beings and cause damages and death in certain cases. Mutations observed in human bodies have always resulted in some mental and physical abnormalities, such as Mongolism, Dwarfism, Albinism, cancer, and deformities caused by radiations.
Scientists have compared mutations to an earthquake in a city. In the same way that earthquakes do not develop cities but destroy them, mutations do not improve living things, but rather damage them. Beneficial mutation necessary for evolution has never been observed, even after 60 years of experiments to produce beneficial mutations in fruit fly the results have only produced a disabled fruit fly
Despite being an evolutionist himself, Pierre-Paul Grassé, former president of the French Academy of Sciences d said Mutation could never give rise to evolution:
''Mutations, in time, occur incoherently. They are not complementary to one another, nor are they cumulative in successive generations toward a given direction. They modify what preexists, but they do so in disorder, no matter how… As soon as some disorder, even slight appears in an organized being, sickness, then death follows. There is no possible compromise between the phenomenon of life and anarchy.''
He also admitted that "No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution."
To believe that a mechanism such as mutation, which damages, destroys, and kills the living organism, as well as sometimes harming all future generations can give rise to whole new symmetrically beautiful and perfect living beings is not in compliance with science nor with reason and logic. The reason why Darwinists still propose these unscientific claims as a mechanism for evolution is their devotion to the materialistic faith, than to science. They do not want to believe the scientific fact that living beings were created fully formed without the need for evolution and that they have been given their necessary features suiting best to their surroundings already when they first appeared on earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment